Join for free to receive email notifications about new posts submitted to paid tiers
Join for free to receive email notifications about new posts submitted to paid tiers
Thanks so much for your support! Let me know I can best Serve you! GIve your feedback!
Recieve Credits for making production possible in all my films
Get access to live voice and text chat on air during Lifting The Veil Live broadcasts!
As a patron, you'll be recognized for making it possible in all my full video presentations.
Get access to live voice and text chat on air during Lifting The Veil Live broadcasts! Credits on an upcoming video Plus all previous rewards
Get access to live voice and text chat on air during Lifting The Veil Live broadcasts!
Get full access to what im working on as well as my extended cuts. All Rewards in lower Tiers
free copy of my E-book article "CALLING ALL RELIGIONS! TRUE ANCIENT HIDDEN EVIDENCE OF RELIGIOUS ORIGIN!" (upon request)
Free Ebook copies of all of my presentation archives inluding unfinished draft projects before publication! (upon request) DVD or Blu Ray HD copies of any of my full films and videos of your choice! PDF ebooks of all of my presentations! (Upon Request) weekly Q&A hangout to discuss anything you want!
All perks of lower tiers upon request!
+Free access to full one hour skype session per week by request for absolutely anything you want to talk about
All the rewards in Lower Tiers,
"Viktor had given his life for water, the forests, the soil and for #Nature's wholeness and order. Academically untrained his writings and testimonials confirm his breadth of learning and his #reseach reflects his extensive #knowledge of #physics, #chemistry and hydrology. He was once asked to explain his authority and knowledge, he replied that no one had taught him but he had the advantage of inheritance which he defined further: "Everything is corpuscular, even #energy and #light waves.
Even matter is inert energy. This also applies to blood, which is a materialised power flow that carries energy from past generations through present to future generations. This flow is not broken with the person's death, but is carried further to his successors.
However, this energy can be degenerated, for example, by negative #technology, so that the thoughts and outlook which have accumulated within a person's being over thousands of years, is lost. It is possible for the person who has the advantage of this gift of inheritance to summon up from his blood all this reservoir of knowledge." (p.125 ibid.)
Inventions of Viktor Schauberger:Later in his life after witnessing the deterioration of the land and its water ways Viktor produced a number of inventions to counteract the catastrophes propagated by industrialisation.
From the observable environmental problems, Viktor concluded that there must be fundamental design errors in the technology which produced such upheavals in nature or at least produces such poor results. For example steam and internal combustion engines work on less than 50% of their capacity. As always he looked to nature to find the answer and the solution he found was that harmful technologies were using the wrong sort of motion.
Nature frequently uses the hyperbolic #spiral which is externally centripetal and internally moves towards the centre, such spirally movements are found in the spiral nebula of galaxies in #space, in the natural flow of water, blood and sap.
While the centrifugal force used by current technology, occurs in nature in its destructive aspects, on occasions for dissolving energy, pushing the medium from the centre outwards towards the periphery in straight lines.
The particles of the medium being first weakened and then dissolved and broken up. "Nature uses this action to disintegrate complexes which have lost their vitality or have died" (p. 77 ibid.)
Characteristically the centripetal, hyperbolic spiral movement is symptomatic of falling temperature, contraction and concentration while the centrifugal movement is synonymous with raising temperature, heat extension, expansion and #explosion, "in nature there is a continual switch from one movement to the other, but if development is to occur then the movement of growth must be predominant." (p.77 ibid.) source http://www.lightnet.co.uk/frontier/viktor.htm
Water is ubiquitous and it may be from this property that it is frequently taken for granted. Even though it is everywhere, water is anything but common.Most people think that water comes in 3 shapes and sizes and they all have the formula H2O. We recognize ice as water in its solid form, water as the liquid stage and steam as water as a gas.AND, THERE IS MORE TO THE STORY.For the last few decades, researchers have been differentiating “bulk water” from other water and there is now a name for this other water: Exclusion Zone or EZ Water. It is also called structured water, energized water, revitalized water, activated water and more. Whatever the name, this fourth stage of water acts like a battery capable of storing energy. When EZ water is structured by movement, prayer or light, the energy in it increases.
In the old way of thinking about water, the addition of energy leads to a rise in temperature. In EZ water, an increase in energy leads to an increase in structure. Not only is this understanding of water uncovering a new state of water, but it is also illuminating a new chemical formula.The most common formula for water is H2O, but it can also be H3O2, OH-, -OH2+ and dozens of other configurations of hydrogen and oxygen.ONE OF THE LEADING RESEARCHERS ON THIS TOPIC IS DR. GERALD POLLACK WHO HAS RECENTLY PUBLISHED A NEW BOOK: “THE FOURTH PHASE OF WATER.” IN HIS BOOK, DR. POLLACK PUTS FORTH A NEW FORMULA FOR US TO PONDER:HOW STRUCTURING CHANGES WATER MOLECULES
When water is structured, its properties change. Before taking a deep look at this with water, consider where else this occurs in the natural world.These pictures show that while the chemical composition of diamonds and coal are both made of carbon, the difference in the bonding angles of the carbon gives the two physical substances very different properties. All will agree that diamonds and coal are very different and that is largely because the differences can be seen with our vision. Unfortunately, the differences between structured water and bulk water are just beyond the frequencies where our eyes can see so we are left with science to show us how different waters change.
The following images were produced by an Independent laboratory in Germany that analyzed Structured Water.
The images show evidence of a change in bonding angles much like what we see with diamonds and coal.
While the images clearly show water that is structured looks different, we have to rely on the scientists to interpret what that means in terms of how the properties of the water change.The conclusions of the lab that performed this analysis, Hagalis AG, are that the structured water:has different hydrogen bonding angles than unstructured waterhas increased life force energyincreased bio-availability of trace minerals and elementsneutralized all toxinsThe full report may be read here.The conversation about the diamonds, coal and hydrogen bonding angles can best be summarized by the well known materials scientist, Dr. Rustum Roy. Roy who had professorships at Arizona State University, University of Arizona, and Pennsylvania State University offered:“STRUCTURES CHANGE PROPERTIES VASTLY MORE EASILY AND DRAMATICALLY THAN CHEMISTRY CHANGES THEM.” – DR. RUSTUM ROY Looking at the natural world shows this to be true in all areas of life. Consider the structure of your life. Consider where you live, who you interact with and how you know yourself to be. Now, if we were to remove you from those structures and put you in an entirely different socio-economic class, do you think you would change? We do. We think the structures around you would dictate new ways of speaking and being.THE MOST IMPORTANT PROPERTY OF WATER IS ENERGYTo truly understand the science of water, it is important to understand that water is energy and this energy is measurable.MEASURING THE ENERGY OF WATER“GDV” or Gas Discharge Visualization is a collection of photographic processes used to capture images of electrical discharges. Through this process we’re able to measure variances of everyday substances, such as water. GDV is a pathway to measuring how much “E” is found in a given type of water. Consider the results to the right.In the image with the black background, increased brightness is indicative of increased energy. Notice how Filtered Water and natural Spring Water have significantly less energy than water structured by a structuring device. Structuring water can increase the energy by up to 83%This increase in energy can have a very beneficial impact on your body. See to the right as GDV analysis is used to measure the human body.This image shows how drinking Structured Water impacts the human body’s energy. The image on the left is before drinking Structured Water and on the right, after. People who drink Structured Water experience a minimum 10% increase in their energy and for some it is as high as 40%.MEASURING THE ENERGY OF YOUThe human body is made of water so it naturally follows that water with more energy in it will lead to a body with more energy in it. And that is exactly what the results show.Even with proof showing the increased energy of Structured Water, there will still be those who need more information to understand that Structured Water exists. While the naked eye is unable to distinguish a glass of tap water from a glass of Structured Water, scientists are able to do it.
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT GDV, WATCH THIS VIDEO FEATURING THE CREATOR OF THE TECHNOLOGY.
TO LEARN MORE FROM DR. VOGEL DIRECTLY, WATCH THIS VIDEO:Dr. Marcel Vogel was a top research scientist for 27 years for IBM. His life’s passion was expressed through the use of scientific instruments. He spent over 1 year of his life focused on experiments to determine or deny the existence of Structured Water. Using Ultra Violet Spectral Photometry he concluded:evidence of structuring in the form of visual bands in the range of 3000-4000 angstrom units
Structured Water is different than bulk water including that it stores energy
one drop of Structured Water raises the energy level of a container of liquid instantly
when water molecules link up in structure, they form a consciousness which is to say that water molecules organize themselves and store information
water is the future of medicine as it can be programmed to have desired health giving energies
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dreamhillresearch.com%2Fmarcelvogel&h=AT0jLzkwZtz4f4y3zEUSqUtSrb3O6DX4orRO7HZ2bWLVJSaVyx2TA_ArkKSByHIuRXNuIvJ8DTVS7TWINXeYlCwZV5fCgKYfISbCoWLsMiXXSnvZOjYlFk_5DqJO5K-AW9RNoNdrstU
PURITYTHE SCIENCE BEHIND TRADITIONAL FILTERS: CHEMISTRYA water molecule is smaller than a wave of light and many contaminants are measured in parts per million, billion or even trillion. These small sizes make the science of water filtration much less precise than people think. After working for six different filter companies and doing due diligence on many more, we think it is important to consider the following science and practices.traditional filters don’t remove contaminants as much as they reduce them
testing is expensive and companies do their best to avoid having to test for more than the bare minimum
companies that make claims about toxin removal often due so based on extrapolation rather than laboratory testing. For example, we know of a publicly traded traditional filter company that claims pharmaceutical removal based upon extrapolation rather than testing.
traditional filters may not protect us at allAt least $100 billion is spent annually on traditional water filters and plastic bottled water. There is a lot of money being made on our fear about the safety of our drinking water. Much of that money goes into marketing campaigns that infiltrate our thinking and cause us to come to the same conclusion.I’ve spent an awful lot of time thinking about why almost all people have the same questions and concerns about water and my conclusion is that it is because that is the way our minds are programmed by marketing.You probably entered the conversation about protecting yourself from contaminants in water with concerns about Fluoride and Chlorine. It is kind of ironic that those are the toxins that we are concerned about because those are the ones that are intentionally added to water. Regardless of what you think, we suggest you consider the following logic as a more likely truth about safe drinking water.Everything is energy including each contaminant in your water.Homeopathy proves that when a physical substance is removed from water (like traditional filters try to do) the energy of it is left behind.
Traditional filters don’t even acknowledge let alone reduce or remove toxic energetic residue in your water.Structuring Water changes the energy of water and clears all toxic memory.To have safe drinking water, at a minimum, you must deal with it as an energy and if it aligns with your budget, values and beliefs you can add a traditional filter as well.Reports from the field:
According to known scientific principles, the Bio Chem Lab report results “shouldn’t” exist. AND, Bio Chem is a NELAP Accredited Laboratory and the results come from November 2012. Click Here for the Bio Chem Lab ReportWhat the results show is that water that was poured through a structuring device that is not expected to have an impact on chemistry showed a reduction of 25% of Ecoli in the water and 40.2% of TDS or Total Dissolved Solids.By passing through the device the expected results included changes in energetic properties but not chemistry. Nevertheless, a significant change was observed. We asked Clayton Nolte about this and he said that by structuring water it spins in a double vortex and when it does solids are crushed and transformed. The implications of this are that the chemistry of water can change without adding or removing anything from water.These types of results are becoming more common.Hannah Noel is an organic farmer and the Editor of Organic Life Magazine. Several years ago, the State of Vermont tested her well and told her she was going to have to use bleach to get rid of the Chloroform that was in the water. As a cancer survivor and an organic farmer, this was untenable for her.Rather than use a traditional physical filtration method, Hannah treated her well with an energetic process. Nothing was physically added or removed from her well and the result was that the State came back and tested for the Chloroform again and found that it was gone.How can this happen? Our scientific equipment is based upon observation of the physical world AND we are learning more and more about what it means to live as energetic beings. In the coming years as Quantum Physics proves we are energetic beings we are going to want to have equipment that measures in alignment with who and what we are.A PLAUSIBLE EXPLANATIONAs individual slices of humanity, we often forget our inherent connectedness and the possibility that their is consciousness in this universe beyond what happens inside our personal world view. This makes sense as it appears that we are wired for self preservation and that can include an overly important sense of self. Nevertheless, a new truth is emerging.Many are experiencing connection to others and the universe through energy. We are finding the evidence that shows that there is much more to life than what is discerned through our traditional five senses. Inside of this emerging world view, it makes sense to consider that water is alive, that is has its own consciousness, that it is our partner and carrier in creating our lives.Today, we hear many people speak of understanding ourselves as beings made of light. This thought appears somewhat confusing for us as when we look at each other, we see solids and not what we think of as light. Nevertheless, many people are able to see the auras of others and according to Dr. Joe Mercola, this light is 1000 times less intense than levels that can be seen with the naked eye.Dr. Mercola is known for his avid research and he explains the work of Dr. Fritz Albert Popp who in 1974 proved that light, in the form of biophotons, is involved in every process in the body including healing.“Every living organism emits biophotons. It is thought that the higher the level of light energy a cell emits, the greater its vitality and the potential for the transfer of that energy to the individual who consumes it… The greater your store of light energy… the greater the power of your overall electromagnetic field, and consequently the more energy is available for healing and maintenance of optimal health.
I firmly believe it’s only a matter of time before the importance of light energy in your health and well-being becomes more widely recognized and applied in the field of medicine. Until then, remember that your body is not only made up of tissue, blood vessels and organs. It’s also composed of light.” – Dr. MercolaAccording to Dr. Pollock (the researcher teaching us about the 4th phase of water) water may be structured in many ways including by adding radiant light. Piecing all of this together what we see is that it may be that a benefit to spending time in the sun beyond getting our Vitamin D is that adding sunlight to our body increases the structure of the water inside us.Getting back to Dr. Popp, he is a German physicist who has written 150 scientific journal articles and eight books and his research shows Structured Water encapsulates micro-particles.
This chart shows the differences in light emissions between structured and tap water. Water that is polluted is more electrolytic because it has more micro particles inside. The readings for Structured Water demonstrate that they are less electrolytic proving that the micro particles (toxins) are no longer present. The laws of chemistry are being challenged and shown to be insufficient for understanding the inner workings of water molecules.The Bio Chem lab report shown above, the State of Vermont testing with Hannah Noel, and this study by Dr. Popp show that water is capable of encapsulating or imploding toxins and rendering water safe. Whether you believe the toxins go to the center of the water molecule (as taught by Clayton Nolte) or transform through vortexing as seen in the Bio Chem report the one thing that is clear is that there is more here than meets the eye.Water does protect us from toxins when it is in a vortex state as found in nature.ESTROGENWith 21 billion pounds of toxins released into the environment every year there is no safe place to hide. The following study of 83 remote European lakes reveals that estrogenic compounds are literally everywhere. Estrogen impacts fertility as well as breast formation in males. The solution for rampant pollution is to be aware of the significance of the issues we face and to set your own standard for water quality. READ STUDYLET’S REVIEWThe most important property of water is energy. Water Magic(™) has shown that water acts like a battery capable of storing energy. This energy is measurable. Drinking water with more energy adds more energy to the body. When water is structured (or energized) its properties change. Reports from certified independent laboratories and scientists show that the physical substances (such as toxins) that are present in water transform when water is structured.With all of this said, we want to offer an explanation as to why this scientific data is discredited when the benefits to humanity are so impactful. From our perspective, the answer is simply. Money.Many businesses have been created to earn profits rather than to serve people. While this may be sad, it is also true. There is over $100 billion in revenue being generated every year by companies selling disposable water filters and plastic water bottles. If their offerings were hydrating people, then we might find a different line of work.However, they are not.At The Wellness Enterprise Inc. our allegiance is to stand for you and your health and vitality. We know that a kinder and more joyful humanity will emerge when people feel healthy and strong and the basis for this vitality begins at the cellular level. We are committed to improving the vitality of your cells and we have the scientific proof to show that Structured Water does exactly that.LIVE BLOOD CELL ANALYSIS VIDEO The video above shows Live Blood Cell Analysis in two segments taken 48 hours apart. The first segment shows spontaneous cell death. The second segment shows the cells after drinking structured water. The cells are shining with light and vitality. Notice in the first segment how cells on the screen simply disappear (die) while in the second segment that is no longer happening.Scientifically speaking, this is the crown jewel of Water Magic. It shows that we can recreate the human body from the inside out simply by changing the water a person consumes.
For those who would like to listen to a discussion about the points presented on this page, there is a recording available:“Scientific Minds Want To Know”00:0000:00Or download here: http://thewellnessenterprise.com/recordings/Scientific-Minds-Wants-To-Know.mp3
(Hint: to save to your computer, right click the link and then choose either “Save Target As” or “Save Link As”)Whether you call it “structuring”, “energizing”, “activating” or something else, we can all agree that there is an enormous amount of interest globally in restoring coherence and vitality to Water and ourselves. As the industry expands and new reports, studies and videos are published, we will continue to publish them here so you may be well informed about the science of Structured Water.Observational Study #1 Kidney DehydrationObservational Study #2 Sports Drink AnalysisH4H Report – Hydration Biomarkers and Dietary Fluid Consumption of Women
A great interview with the inventor of the GDV machine that measures the energy of water, Konstantin Korotkov "
source: https://thewellnessenterprise.com/scientificminds/
In 2005, Syngenta opposed a Swiss ban on genetically engineered organisms.[13]On 28 November 2005, Switzerland enacted a five-year ban on the farming of genetically modified crops, underscoring the problems facing the European Commission and biotech companies like Syngenta, Bayer and Monsanto as they try to overcome consumer doubts about safety.[14]As of 2014 Syngenta's main competitors are Monsanto Company, BASF, Dow AgroSciences, Bayer CropScience and DuPont Pioneer.[15]In 2014, Monsanto sought to acquire Syngenta for a reported $40 billion, but Syngenta rejected the offer.[2][16] Since April 2015 Monsanto and Syngenta had been working with their investment banks Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachsrespectively on a deal. The U.S. Treasury tried to stop the deal for tax inversion.[17] Syngenta's Board of Directors rejected an even better offer by Monsanto during August 2015, and Monsanto withdrew from the negotiations on 26 August.[18]
Syngenta's contributions to US federal candidates, parties, and outside groups totaled $267,902 during 2012, ranking it 10th on the list of companies in its sector.[79] Its lobbying expenditures in the US during 2012 were $1,150,000, ranking it 7th in its sector.[80]
Berkeley – The nation's top-selling weed killer, atrazine, disrupts the sexual development of frogs at concentrations 30 times lower than levels allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), raising concerns about heavy use of the herbicide on corn, soybeans and other crops in the Midwest and around the world.
In an article in the April 16 issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,University of California, Berkeley, developmental endocrinologist Tyrone B. Hayes, associate professor of integrative biology, and his colleagues report that atrazine at levels often found in the environment demasculinizes tadpoles and turns them into hermaphrodites - creatures with both male and female sexual characteristics. The herbicide also lowers levels of the male hormone testosterone in sexually mature male frogs by a factor of 10, to levels lower than those in normal female frogs.
As Hayes later discovered, many atrazine-contaminated ponds in the Midwest contain native leopard frogs with the same abnormalities." http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2002/04/15_frogs.html
In 2006 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had stated that under the Food Quality Protection Act "the risks associated with the pesticide residues pose a reasonable certainty of no harm",[9] and in 2007, the EPA said that atrazine does not adversely affect amphibian sexual development and that no additional testing was warranted.[10]
EPA's 2009 review[11]concluded that "the agency's scientific bases for its regulation of atrazine are robust and ensure prevention of exposure levels that could lead to reproductive effects in humans".[12] EPA started a registration review in 2013.[13]The EPA's review has been criticized, and the safety of atrazine remains controversial.[2][8][14][15]
Scientists not on the payroll of Syngenta and other GMO manufacturers discovered the incidence of human birth defects was greatest during the months of April, May and June, which was when farmers used the greatest amount of atrazine annually.
“Atrazine is an endocrine disruptor. This means that micro-doses can have large, irreversible effects that we are just beginning to understand. New studies link low-level exposure to birth defects, delayed puberty and infertility — all of which are on the rise. Higher cancer risk and environmental toxicity are also of concern.
Birth Defects: Infants concieved during atrazine spray season are more likely to be born with birth defects. Research shows that even low levels of exposure during pregnancy may be problematic; the third trimester appears to be most critical.
Infertility: Documented reproductive harms include male infertility, increased risk of miscarriage, and low infant birth weight.
Cancer: Atrazine may increase risk of breast and prostate cancer. Though some studies have not found a link, the recent President’s Cancer Panel Report calls atrazine a possible carcinogen.
Scientists report that for atrazine, timing of exposure may be more important than exposure levels, and interaction with other pesticides may make health harms more severe.
Evidence of environmental effects is also strong and growing. Recent studies show that atrazine causes genetically male frogs to become anatomically female through a “chemical castration” effect.”
"Atrazine has been a suspected teratogen, with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[46][47] and an estrogen disruptor.[48] A 2002 study by Tyrone Hayes, of the University of California, Berkeley, found that exposure caused male tadpoles to turn into hermaphrodites– frogs with both male and female sexual characteristics.[49]
A 2003 EPA review of this study concluded that overcrowding, questionable sample handling techniques, and the failure of the authors to disclose key details including sample sizes, dose-response effects, and the variability of observed effects made it difficult to assess the study's credibility and ecological relevance.[50]
According to Hayes in 2004, all of the studies that rejected the hermaphroditismhypothesis were plagued by poor experimental controls and were funded by Syngenta, suggesting conflict of interest.[51]
A 2005 Syngenta-funded study, requested by EPA and conducted under EPA guidance and inspection, was unable to reproduce Hayes´ results.[52]"There has been a long running conflict between Syngenta and University of California at Berkeley biologist Tyrone Hayes.According to an article in the 10 February 2014, issue of The New Yorker,Syngenta's public-relations team took steps to discredit Hayes, whose research is purported to suggest that the Syngenta-produced chemical atrazine was responsible for abnormal development of reproductive organs in frogs. The article states that the company paid third-party critics to write articles discrediting Hayes's work, planned to have his wife investigated, and planted hostile audience members at scientific talks given by Hayes.[42]
During a 21 February interview conducted on Democracy Now, Hayes reiterated the claims.[74] After the interview aired, Syngenta denied targeting Hayes or making any threats, calling those statements "uncorroborated and intentionally damaging" and demanding a retraction and public apology from Hayes and Democracy Now.[75]
•POPs have an anthropogenic origin: industrial processes, waste (e.g. medical), traffic and agriculture. A few may be of natural origin, e.g. from volcanic eruptions.•POPs are released into air, water and land – from where they deposit into water, sediment, and enter the food-chain•POPs are globally distributed through the air and ocean currents – they travel long distances and enter into atmospheric processes, air– water exchange and cycles involving rain, snow and dry particles. These processes lead to the exposure of even remote populations of humans and animals that depend on aquatic foods. Humans and animals are exposed mainly via ingestion of contaminated aquatic foodstuffs.•POPs travel long distances and are found in places far away from industrial sites or from agricultural areas, such as the Arctic circle.
"The use of puberty blockers is needless and frivolous. It is even more outrageous when you consider the wealth of research that shows that most of these children will outgrow this condition. Consider the following studies:
*Dr. Paul McHugh cited studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic which showed that 70-80% of children with transgender feelings lost those feelings at some point in time and became comfortable with their birth gender. http://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-mchugh-transgender-surgery-isnt-the-solution-1402615120.
*Dr. Kenneth J. Zucker of the Clarke Institute in Toronto, Canada, treated about 500 pre-adolescent children with gender dysphoria over a period of 30 years. From his experience, about 80% of the children outgrew their gender dysphoria and accepted their original gender. http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/kenneth-zucker.html.
*A 2008 report in The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry says, “Most children with gender dysphoria will not remain gender dysphoric after puberty.”http://www.jaacap.com/article/S0890-8567(08)60142-2/abstract.
*Dr. Edgardo Menvielle treated transgender kids at Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, DC for about 10 years. He says that about 80% of the kids reclaim their birth gender, while the other 20% remained transgender into adulthood. https://www.washingtonpost.com/drug-treatments-for-transgender-kids-pose-difficult-choices-for-parents-doctors/2012/05/19/gIQAxgakbU_story.html.
*A 2015 report by Trombetta, Liguori, and Bertolotto says that in the majority of children, GID remits by adolescence, if not earlier. Follow-up studies of boys who have GID indicate that a desistance of GID with a co-occurring homosexual orientation is the most common outcome.
Trombetta, Liguori, and Bertolotto, Management of Gender Dysphoria, Springer, 2015.
*Gender Trender cites studies showing that only 2% of sex-role non-conforming children will end up seeking surgical sex change, and only about 15% will report some form of continued distress with sex roles post puberty. That means that 85% will end up being comfortable with their birth gender.
*Even The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) confirms this. WPATH is a pro-trans organization. In their own Standards of Care, they acknowledge that “only 6 to 23 per cent of boys and 12 to 27 per cent of girls treated in gender clinics showed persistence of their gender dysphoria into adulthood.” So 77-94% of the boys outgrew it and 73-88% of girls outgrew it. This organization is an ally of trans people, so it would be difficult to discredit their results. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265792166_Ethical_Issues_Raised_by_ the_Treatment_of_Gender-Variant_Prepubescent_Children.
Here we have several credible studies, done by different researchers at different places and times, yet, they all got comparable results. So there is no doubt that the results are accurate. These studies tell us what we should have already known: Most children who have gender dysphoria spontaneously lose those feelings. More than 50% of them outgrow it by adolescence, 80% outgrow it by adulthood, and 99% outgrow it by late adulthood. This is not a shocking result. It should be expected. These are elementary school kids. They will naturally grow up and change. We all have."
"Can a 9-year old child really make the decision to become sterile for life? Sex-change treatment damages the body, stunts growth, and causes permanent sterility. Yet, children are being allowed to make the decision to undergo such drastic treatment. Inevitably, they will change their minds and regret it. Who will take responsibility? "
If a man goes to a psychiatrist and says, “Doc, I think I’m a chicken”, what will the psychiatrist do? Will he stick feathers in the man so he can look like a real chicken? Or will he try to convince the man that he is not really a chicken? Hopefully, he would pick the second choice. Does the first one make any sense at all? Of course not. It’s completely absurd. But it parallels the absurdity of a sex-change operation. If a man thinks he is a woman, he is clearly in a delusional state. Why would the psychiatrist feed the delusion instead of curing it? If he really wants to do what’s best for the man, he would try to help him deal with reality and accept himself for who he is. Transgenders are in a delusional state and are in need of counseling or therapy. To simply affirm their delusion is not helping them at all.
The condition that we are dealing with here is called gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is the magic bullet theory of transgenderism. It is a desperate attempt to make sense out of something that makes no sense at all. Like the magic bullet theory, it cannot withstand scrutiny. It seems almost semi-reasonable on the surface, but falls apart upon closer inspection. Supposedly, this is a medical condition that is “cured” by a sex-change operation. Let’s take a closer look at how gender dysphoria is defined:
Gender Dysphoria: unhappiness with one's biological sex or its usual gender role, with the desire for the body and role of the opposite sex.
A persistent unease with having the physical characteristics of one's gender, accompanied by strong identification with the opposite gender and a desire to live as or to become a member of the opposite gender.
Dissatisfaction or discomfort with one's phenotypic gender.[1]
Notice the use of words like “unhappiness,” “unease,” “identification,” “dissatisfaction,” and “discomfort.” These are all words that indicate a psychological condition. There is no medical or physical confirmation of any of these symptoms. The diagnosis of gender dysphoria is based completely on how the patient feels. He is “unhappy” with his biological sex, or he is “dissatisfied” with his gender. But what medical tests are there to confirm this? Do blood tests show gender dysphoria? Does the CAT-Scan or MRI show gender dysphoria? Do the X-rays show that the patient is in the wrong body? No. Medically speaking, gender dysphoria is a phantom disease. There is no medical diagnosis for it. Because it is all based on the patient’s subjective experience, the only diagnosis is the patient’s own self-diagnosis. He feels like he’s in the wrong body, so he is. There is no test to show if that feeling is right or not. That feeling could be caused by things like trauma, stress, drugs, pressure, etc. In other words, that feeling could be wrong. Yet, that feeling is all that defines this condition.
[1] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/gender+dysphoria.
By Michael Greger M.D. FACLM on February 14th, 2013"For years we didn’t know why eating a plant-based diet appeared to so dramatically improve cancer defenses within just a matter of weeks. But researchers recently figured it out: eating healthy lowers the level of the cancer promoting growth hormone IGF-1. This saga was detailed in the last four blog posts:" Cancer-Proofing Your BodyHow Do Plant-Based Diets Fight Cancer?Vegan Men: More Testosterone But Less Cancer" (with cited studies and charts from the studies further down.
He goes on to present:
"In The Answer to the Pritikin Puzzle, we established that the reason the blood of those eating plant-based diets appeared 8 TIMES better at fighting cancer cell growth (see Ex Vivo Cancer Proliferation Bioassay), is likely due to the drop in IGF-1 levels, especially in those following vegan diets (see How Plant-Based to Lower IGF-1?). Now it appears we know why—their avoidance of animal protein. Let’s go one level deeper, and ask why animal protein preferentially triggers IGF-1 release.
Three years ago, I profiled a remarkable series of experiments about IGF-1—insulin-like growth factor 1—this cancer-promoting growth hormone, released in excess amounts by our liver when we eat animal protein. So, men and women who don’t eat meat, egg whites, or dairy proteins have significantly lower levels circulating within their bodies.How Plant-Based to Lower IGF-1?Those eating #vegan had significantly lower IGF-1 levels and higher IGF-binding proteins than those just eating vegetarian, suggesting that the more plant-based one’s diet becomes, the lower one’s risk of fueling growth hormone-dependent cancer growth.
Switching people to a plant-based diet can significantly lower IGF-1 levels within just 11 days, markedly improving the ability of women’s bloodstreams to suppress breast cancer growth, and then kill breast cancer cells off.
Similarly, the blood serum of men on plant-based diets suppresses prostate cancer cell growth about eight times better than before they changed their diet. This dramatic improvement in cancer defenses is, however, abolished if you add back just the amount of IGF-1 banished from their systems because they were eating and living healthier.This is one way to explain the low rates of cancer among plant-based populations: the drop in animal protein intake leads to a drop in IGF-1, which leads to a drop in cancer growth. An effect so powerful, Dr. Dean Ornish and colleagues appeared to be able to reverse the progression of prostate cancer without chemo, surgery, or radiation—just a plant-based diet, and other healthy lifestyle changes.
Now, when we’re kids, we need growth hormones to grow. There’s a rare genetic defect that causes severe IGF-1 deficiency, leading to a type of dwarfism—but also apparently makes you effectively cancer-proof. Not a single death from cancer in about 100 individuals with IGF-1 deficiency. How about 200 individuals? None developed cancer. See, most malignant tumors are covered in IGF-1 receptors. But if there’s no IGF-1 around, then they may not be able to grow and spread."
IGF-1 as One-Stop Cancer Shop
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/igf-1-as-one-stop-cancer-shop/
Cited clinical literature:Yang SY, Miah A, Pabari A, Winslet M. Growth Factors and their receptors in cancer metastases. Front Biosci. 2011 Jan 1;16:531-8.Zhang Y, Ma B, Fan Q. Mechanisms of breast cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2010 Jun 1;292(1):1-7.Kleinberg DL, Wood TL, Furth PA, Lee AV. Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in the Transition from Normal Mammary Development to Preneoplastic Mammary Lesions. Endocr Rev. 2009 Feb;30(1):51-74.
Salvioli S, Capri M, Bucci L, Lanni C, Racchi M, Uberti D, Memo M, Mari D, Govoni S, Franceschi C. Why do centenarians escape or postpone cancer? The role of IGF-1, inflammation and p53. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009 Dec;58(12):1909-17.Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group, Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, Roddam AW. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):530-42Rowlands MA, Gunnell D, Harris R, Vatten LJ, Holly JM, Martin RM. Circulating insulin-like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009 May 15;124(10):2416-29.
Piantanelli L. Cancer and aging: from the kinetics of biological parameters to the kinetics of cancer incidence and mortality. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;521:99-109.
Cancer-Proofing MutationCongenital IGF-1 deficiency can lead to Laron Syndrome (a type of dwarfism); but with such low growth hormone levels, those with the condition have dramatically lower cancer rates. This raises the question of whether one can achieve the best of both worlds—by ensuring adequate IGF-1 levels during childhood, while then suppressing excess growth promotion in adulthood.
"Higher Quality" Protein May Mean Higher RiskThe reason animal proteins trigger the release of the cancer-promoting growth hormone IGF-1 more than plant proteins may be because the relative ratios of amino acids in animal proteins more closely resembles our own.
Animalistic Plant ProteinsWhile animal proteins increase levels of the cancer-promoting growth hormone IGF-1, and most plant proteins bring levels down, “high quality” plant proteins, such as soy, may not significantly affect levels in either direction. This, however, may depend on the quantity consumed.
Lower levels of the cancer-promoting growth hormone IGF-1 in those eating vegan is not expected to affect their accumulation of muscle mass.
NY Times Best Selling author and world renown Robin Hood of clinical nutritional science, Michael Greger M.D. founder of the modern day "Library of Alexandria of nutritional science" website Nutritionfacts.org presents:
"Sulfur dioxide preservatives in dried fruit, sulfites in wine, and the putrefaction of undigested animal protein in the colon can release hydrogen sulfide, the rotten egg gas associated with inflammatory bowel disease."
It’s been estimated that with a typical Western diet, up to 12 grams of protein per day can escape digestion, and when it reaches the colon, it can be turned into toxic substances like ammonia. This degradation of undigested protein in the colon is called putrefaction, so a little meat can actually end up putrefying in our colon. The problem is that some of the by-products of this putrefaction can be toxic.It’s generally accepted that carbohydrate fermentation—the fiber and resistant starches that reach our colon—results in beneficial effects for the host because of the generation of short-chain fatty acids like butyrate, whereas protein fermentation is considered detrimental for us. Protein fermentation mainly occurs in the lower end of the colon, when carbohydrates get depleted, and results in the production of potentially toxic metabolites. Perhaps that’s why we see more colorectal cancer and ulcerative colitis lower down, because that’s where the protein is putrefying. The simplest strategy to reduce the degree of potentially harmful compounds by protein fermentation is probably a reduction in dietary protein intake.But, the accumulation of these harmful byproducts of protein metabolism may be attenuated by the fermentation of undigested plant matter. This study showed that if you give people foods containing resistant starch—starch resistant to small intestine digestion so it can feed our good bacteria down in our colon–foods such as cooked beans, peas, lentils, raw oatmeal, and cold pasta, you can block the accumulation of potentially harmful byproducts of protein metabolism. The more starch ended up in the stool, the less ammonia, for example.But there’s protein in plants too. The difference is that animal proteins tend to have more sulfur-containing amino acids like methionine, which can be turned into hydrogen sulfide in our colon–the rotten egg gas that may play a role in the development of inflammatory bowel diseases like ulcerative colitis, as I’ve covered previously."
Taurocholic Acid Metabolism by Gut Microbes and Colon Cancer
""COLORECTAL CANCER (CRC) IS ONE OF THE MOST FREQUENT CAUSES OF CANCER DEATH WORLDWIDE AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH ADOPTION OF A DIET HIGH IN ANIMAL PROTEIN AND SATURATED FAT. Saturated fat induces increased bile secretion into the intestine. Increased bile secretion selects for populations of gut microbes capable of altering the bile acid pool, generating tumor-promoting secondary bile acids such as deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid. Epidemiological evidence suggests CRC is associated with increased levels of DCA in serum, bile, and stool. Mechanisms by which secondary bile acids promote CRC are explored.
Furthermore, in humans, bile acid conjugation can vary by diet. Vegetarian diets favor glycine conjugation while diets high in animal protein favor taurine conjugation.
Metabolism of taurine conjugated bile acids by gut microbes generates hydrogen sulfide, a genotoxic compound. Thus, taurocholic acid has the potential to stimulate intestinal bacteria capable of converting taurine and cholic acid to hydrogen sulfide and deoxycholic acid, a genotoxin and tumor-promoter, respectively."
M. Ridlon, Jason & Wolf, Patricia & Gaskins, Rex. (2016). Taurocholic Acid Metabolism by Gut Microbes and Colon Cancer. Gut Microbes. 7. 00-00. 10.1080/19490976.2016.1150414.
Then we also have the carcinogenic decaying animal amines PUTRESCINE, CADAVERINE, and spermine which also have toxicological effects. You all need to do your serious homework on what exactly is in animal foods. Nutrients are not just a beneficial aspect of biochemistry. The most important study is of detrimental effects of nutrition.
"Woman eats some mackerel at a restaurant, and just collapses. When fish starts spoiling, toxins can be released—even when the fish still tastes and smells fine—and can cause what may actually be the most common cause of food poisoning from fish.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by veganmontreal."
"Given how vascular our kidneys are, it should comes as no surprise that animal protein, animal fat, and cholesterol are associated with declining kidney function (microalbuminurea—loss of protein in the urine), which can be an early warning sign not only for kidney failure, but also for heart disease and a shortened lifespan."
"A high fat diet encourages growth of the bacteria in the colon that produce enzymes that uncouple those unabsorbable estrogen complexes formed in the liver. Then the uncoupled “free” estrogen is absorbed back into the blood stream, resulting in higher total levels of estrogen in the woman’s body. Fats, especially meat fats, will encourage the growth of these colon bacteria that are capable of splitting these complexes. Obviously, this means of making free-estrogens available for re-absorption can contribute to a situation that favor development of breast cancer.Fortunately, fibers present in vegetable foods also help to block the absorption of “free” estrogens found in the bowel.Vegetarian women, compared with those who eat meats, excrete 2 to 3 times more estrogen in their feces. Furthermore, the blood levels of certain powerful estrogens are 50% lower than are those in meat-eaters."