"Then there’s this gem from Friday’s @IDPH webinar. The speaker actually said “nonrespirator masks cannot filter small particles...like viruses”.
I was stunned listening to that admission. Yet they continue to endorse mere cloth rags or procedure masks despite all the evidence that concludes they do little to nothing to prevent anything.
I have provided over 9 hours of peer reviewed published medical science journals & the highest tiers of Published evidence on screen with government data resources for all claims made. This film is irrefutable. That is far more data & evidence than any public health authority has provided to the public.
There is so much misinformation & confusion going around. We need to do a deep dive into the available data & make sense from the worlds leading experts in the field & compare it to what is being recommended & how those recommendations are perfectly aligned with a pre ordained agenda by multinational tech, surveillance capitalism, & 4th industrial revolution giants, the patents & policies being put in place that serve their purpose. I do not wish to spread sensationalism, or false claims, which is why i've included all my cited references on screen for fact checking all claims made.
IInoculum of Truth 2💉🦠🧬 Cov🆔 2021 ☣️ CoronaVirus Documentary 👀 Follow The Psyence 🤖Lifting The Veil part 1 here https://tinyurl.com/aevy7ftx
If you disagree or are offended with parts of the video, I ask you to actually take notes, make a researched rebuttal, please feel free & post the evidence that provides correction & I will take measures to review it and correct my work accordingly. #Coronavirus, #LiftingTheVeil #Science
CRUCIAL UPDATE!
PATREON SUPPORT IS TRYING TO MAKE ME DELETE THIS DATA, CLAIMING THAT IT VIOLATES "MEDICAL MISINFO" POLICY AGAINST "UNFOUNDED OR DEBUNKED THEORIES"!
DEAR PATREON TRUST AND SAFETY TEAM: THIS POST IS NOT UNSUBSTANTIATED OR UNFOUNDED OR DEBUNKED THEORY, IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED MEDICAL SCIENTIFIC FACT IN THE PEER REVIEWED LITERATURE!
"The role of face masks in the control and prevention of COVID-19 remains an issue of debate.
Prior to COVID-19, most studies assessing the effectiveness of face masks as a protective measure in the community came from studies on influenza, which provided little evidence to support their use.
This technical report reviews the evidence that has been accumulated since the emergence of COVID-19, in addition to what has existed on this topic prior to the pandemic,"
. Evidence for the effectiveness of non-medical face masks, face shields/visors and respirators in the community is scarce and of very low certainty.
Importance " Clinical studies have been inconclusive about the effectiveness of N95 respirators and medical masks in preventing health care personnel (HCP) from acquiring workplace viral respiratory infections."
"there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of N95 respirators and medical masks in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza among participants routinely exposed to respiratory illnesses in the workplace.
In addition, there were no significant differences between N95 respirators and medical masks in the rates of acute respiratory illness, laboratory-detected respiratory infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory illness, and influenzalike illness among participants.
A sensitivity analysis suggested that the primary analysis reported was fairly robust to the missing outcome data with quantitative outcomes varying by less than 5%.
This supports the finding that neither N95 respirators nor medical masks were more effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza or other viral respiratory infection or illness among participants when worn in a fashion consistent with current US clinical practice.
Respiratory viruses are primarily transmitted by large droplets. Because a fraction of respiratory viruses may be transmitted by aerosol, N95 respirators have been presumed to provide better protection than medical masks against viral respiratory infections in health care settings.2However, definitive evidence of greater clinical effectiveness of N95 respirators is lacking.
A well-designed trial6 found the effectiveness of medical masks to be noninferior to N95 respirators, but the trial was stopped prematurely and was limited by small sample size.
Two additional studies3,4 (and a pooled analysis12) concluded that N95 respirators may be more effective than medical masks; however, these studies were limited by uncertain clinical significance of end points.24
The current study was undertaken because of remaining uncertainty based on previous studies, which made it challenging for infection control clinicians to effectively implement respiratory protection programs in health care settings.2,7,13,18,24,25
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Orthopaedic Trauma Service and COVID-19: Practice Considerations to Optimize Outcomes and Limit Exposure
Author Information Stinner, Daniel J. MD, PhDa; Lebrun, Christopher MDb; Hsu, Joseph R. MDc; Jahangir, A. Alex MD, MMHCa; Mir, Hassan R. MD, MBAd
ALL THE STUDIES FIND THAT MASKS ARE NOT RESPIRATORY PROTECTION!
Here are key anchor points to the extensive scientific literature that establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., “N95”) does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness:
Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.
None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.
“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”
Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016 https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
“We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, Pages 1934–1942, https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant”; as per Fig. 2c therein:
Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. ... Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Conclusion Regarding That Masks Do Not Work
No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions.
Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more on this below).
Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit.
All of my full video presentations and articles can be found at patreon.com/LiftingTheVeil for full #esoteric film presentations, research articles, livestream hangouts, lessons and so much more mind blowing esoteric content on theology, mythology, etymology and language, symbolism, science, biology, health and so much more! SEE YOU SOON! MUCH LOVE, PEACE AND WISDOM!
SubscribeStar and its trusted third parties collect browsing information as specified in the Privacy Policy and use cookies or similar technologies for analysis and technical purposes and, with your consent, for functionality, experience, and measurement as specified in the Cookies Policy.
Log in
