The same phenomena can manifest as waves or particles. Light can propagate as discrete photons in a quantum manner or as rays in the manner of waves. Matter can also exist as particles or waves. Whether we experience the universe as vibrational waves form or bundles of particles depends on our choice as human beings and the logical structure of primary consciousness. Our manner of observation determines what we see.

Hi Dr Tom. Great talk. I really like the way you question things and explain them. I would like to add you mentioned a week a ago that we need to find a win-win solution out of this mess. Dr Robert Malone admits he has done a lot of bad things to mice etc and I think this is his redemption moment now. He mentions being injured after taking the vaccines. I think that woke him up. But I think we use what he can offer ( a way to get Dr Fauci to retire finally for example ) and then by asking Dr Robert and others questions like a teacher would the new path forward will be grounded in real science and hopefully less animal testing. Back to actual thinking. We also need to allow space for them to forgive themselves. I believe the Rockefeller medical movement had young scientists and doctors hurt animals on purpose for no real reason not to find out anything but to make them less human. More like robots. Cause them pain so they would just follow orders. Keep them in silos. Like if they can live with themselves doing this amount of horrible things then they will accept the next worse thing. The whole agenda is a trans human one. So we win by reconnecting all of us to being humans again. The side of the pursuit of truth is more fun, more loving , more connected to nature and more human. That’s the win-win I think.

Thank you!!!

As always you amaze me with the way you present. Really like your style. I just listened to a discussion on BardsFm with David Martin from Jan 10th on the way people think. I’ve heard several of his talks on what’s behind the curtain but he has a different way to look at the world we live in this talk. He starts off with some history back to Roman times about finance but then take a hard left into perception of the way we think. Anyway I’m very blessed to have found your site and have learned much. Thank you

Hi there,
I’m not sure the best way to communicate about something to do with your SubscribeStar presentations. The viewer on SubscribeStar no longer has a way to adjust volume level or to start viewing at different points along the timeline. As a result, any time I close down my computer I have to start viewing from the beginning, which is frustrating because I can’t tell how long the whole presentation is, nor start viewing from where I left off.
I looked for a place to adjust the viewer controls but can’t find anything. Is there a way to return to the older viewer that still had these two options?
Many thanks!

Just an amazing and wonderful hour. Those poor mice. Science today is really an occult religion.
As for the electron, you are on the right path Dr. C. Keep digging. If you have not looked into Ken Wheelers work, he goes by the handle theoria apophasis. He is obese and willfully ignorant about nutrition and health, but he is a brilliant linguist with a knowledge of 7 languages including ancient Pali and Greek. He specializes in Ether Field Theory, Magnetism and electricity as well as metaphysics.
He wrote a paper on definitions as well as a primer that are worth a read. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NXMM8GjqiFsg8K... https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K_0zJJd4U1QKpl...
In his definitions paper in a nut shell he says an electron is the dynamic principle of discharge the terminal end of one uniy of dielectric induction.

Here is what he writes on the ELECTRON

Particle fantasy concept from Atomism. A terminal of electrostatic or dielectric induction is what is reified as an ‘electron’.

A fallacious atomistic conceptualization of charge carrying medium, or particles with no basis in reality. The phenomenon of the non-existent electron in fact is the terminal of one unit of dielectric induction.

Regarding J.J. Thomson’s concept of the "electron" (his own discovery), Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.
You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the
“flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance.

There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation; this belongs only to fields, which are all modalities of the Ether.
The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, nor objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not
charge-carriers; fields are not particles, nor are they “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space
involving ‘electrons’ not to mention that space is not a field terminal.
The ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even
more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, as meant Atomists.

Electricity is the Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, and is the radiative termination of electrical discharge.

Dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether gives rise to electrification whose unit is conceptualized incorrectly as an ‘electron’.
Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview: On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original.
He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an “electron” as pictured by science.
“To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could
exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal
pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of
the bubble!Just to mention another improbability...” - Nikola Tesla Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future”
(Popular Science Monthly)
“My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a
surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the ‘electron’ leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum
it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal.” – N. Tesla

“There is no rest mass to an ‘electron’. It is given here the ‘electron’ is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of
the tensions within the dielectric lines of force.

They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.” – E. Dollard

“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)
JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle
terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb.
This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of
what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron)
In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard

Very interesting, thanks for sharing!